Слепое тестирование кабеля

я твой мыш шатал

IgorGor:

если вы видите разницу между двумя не совсем плохими кабелями

Вы с кем-то попутали

серпентарий

del

del

А я вот как раз ищу для своей вертушки, межблочник и силовой кабель, рассмотрю любые предложения (китай не предлагать)

del

Так же насчет "цифры" - ей не все равно, сколько раз она писана-переписана, очень не рекомендуется
многократное копирование с А-В, c В-С, С-D и и т.д. - происходит искажение информации, что потом может неисправимо отразиться на качестве звука в области средних-высоких частот.))

- 2 X666 Мне тут одна мысль пришла. Скажи, ты отличишь на слух на своей аппаратуре один и тот же файл, закодированный в одном случае на 320 килобит, а в другом случае - на 256 килобит одним и тем же кодеком? вот просто интересно.
- 320 vs 250 запросто, если мастером является качественная сложная музыка с акустическими инструментами и с естественной реверберацией. Дело не в шумах, а в тембровом обеднении и деградации сигнала.

http://gothic.com.ua/ukrrus/forum/index.php?showtopic=7761

del

GISO perspektive klein2

For galvanic separation of network connections in digital audio

High-frequency interference from computer peripherals, the electric grid and the high-frequency components of digital audio signals can negatively influence sensitive analog audio signals and thus significantly disrupt listening enjoyment. Therefore, devices which serve as a "bridge" between the analog and digital world (AD or DA converters) have always been special components which are recommended (AES) or even obligatory (EBU) in the standardisation guidelines of the professional studio industry; so-called transformers - small hardware elements, which transfer a signal in a purely inductive manner without a physical connection to the conductor - prevent or at least decrease these disruptive influences.

ACOUSENCE now has years of experience in high-resolution digital recording formats as almost no other music production company does. Over the years, this has led to a number of in-house innovations which we use for our own productions: devices which better shield sensitive analog audio electronics from disruptive high-frequency, digital source components and which improve the signal quality of the transfer cables between digital sources and converter units (e.g. Jitter). Both are achieved by employing simply the very best transformers which are specially designed for this process.

The considerable qualitative gain through the use of these units moved us to test the technology on personal hi-fi equipment as well. Because when dealing with streamers, for example, network connections link the digital to the analog world more and more often. The synchronicity aspect (Jitter) plays no role here per se. But since computers and the entire EDP environment and network peripherals as a rule contain great potential for disruption, a consistent shield against these disruptive signals is even more important.

In listening tests, the use of GISO - quasi as a cable adapter in front of the end device where the analog audio playback takes place - has shown to produce a significant improvement. It should also be mentioned, however, that due to differing set-ups, the extent of the improvement may vary and thus all users should test the device on their own equipment before making a decision to buy. In our tests, the analog audio gained significant clarity, nuances and as a result musicality. Only the extent of the improvement varied. So test it for yourself!

http://www.acousence.de/index.php?option=com_content&view=article ... 90&lang=en